


Unapproved: This technology or standard can be used only if a STAT review is conducted and signed byĪssociate Deputy Assistant Secretary ( ADAS), Enterprise Program Management Office ( EPMO) or designeeĪnd based upon a recommendation from the Strategic Technology Alignment Team ( STAT) Working Group ( WG), In the VA Decision Matrix is considered unapproved for use.Īpproved: The technology/standard has been approved for use.Īpproved w/Constraints: The technology/standard can be used within the specified constraints locatedīelow the decision matrix in the footnote and on the General tab. Any major.minor version that is not listed To ensure that the target version of the technology will be supported. Responsibility to consult the organizations responsible for the desktop, testing, and/or production environments These decisions areīased upon the best information available as of the most current date. The VA Decision Matrix displays the current and future VA IT position regarding different releases of a TRM entry. TRM Technology, obtained from the vendor (or from the release source). The Vendor Release table provides the known releases for the For additional information or assistance regarding Section 508, please contact the Section 508 Office at Decisions Section 508 compliance may be reviewed by the Section 508 Office and appropriate remedial action required if necessary. The Implementer of this technology has the responsibility to ensure the version deployed is 508-compliant. This technology has not been assessed by the Section 508 Office. Prior to use of this technology, users should check with their supervisor, Information Security Officer (ISO), Facility Chief Information Officer (CIO), or local Office of Information and Technology (OI&T) representative to ensure that all actions are consistent with current VA policies and procedures prior to implementation. Users must ensure sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. Users must ensure their use of this technology/standard is consistent with VA policies and standards, including, but not limited to, VA Handbooks 61 VA Directives 6004, 6513, and 6517 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards, including Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS).
#Leapfrog viewer software#
LeapFrog Viewer is a free software that allows users to view projects exported from paid LeapFrog 3D modelling products. More information on the proper use of the TRM can be found on the Defiance Silver - I couldn't release the San Acaci.Technologies must be operated and maintained in accordance with Federal and Department security and.Advance Gold - A special kind of company.We seem to have 2 populations of samples, one centered ~1.5 g/t Au (red dashed curve) and a second at 0.1 g/t Au (blue dashed line). Here is a semi-log graph of the assays - basically we're looking at how many samples (y-axis is frequency) occur within a certain assay range.įor example: In the chart below, the highest bar tells us that 38 samples returned assays between 1.5 and 2 g/t Au. If this was drilling data, we would expect a top cut to been applied (here is a great presentation on cutting/capping high-grade samples - link) We can also see that there are only 4-5 samples containing >30 g/t Au, and in the last post we saw the dramatic effect they had on the overall average grade for Trench 4. We can also see that they are less than 5m apart and that ultra-high grade zone is very small (6m x 6m). We can see that the ultra-high grade assays in trench 4 aren't repeated in the corresponding/adjacent samples in Trench 1. Why don't we focus on the very high-grade part of trench 4 We can see that this zone has approximate dimensions of 250m x 125m. I've drawn on a guesstimate >1 g/t Au contour. Left = trenches colored by number right = trench Au assays So I've compiled the data from the Cuale trenches, the Leapfrog viewer file is here (l ink)
